![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [dailyarchive/2005_02/exchange_rates.htm] | Daily Edition: San José, Costa Rica, February 01, 2005
European Union Escalates Regulatory Authority Chamber of Commerce
Newcomers’ Club Meeting Acting Workshop
Edited By Robert Goodier
The European Commission notified the World Trade Organization (WTO) yesterday of its intention to raise tariffs on banana imports from Latin America from 75 euros ($98) to 280 euros ($300) per ton, effective in 2006. The notification demonstrates the commission’s unwillingness to negotiate directly with the leaders of Latin American banana-producing countries, despite those leaders’ hopes, expressed at last week’s summit in Ecuador (TT, Jan. 31) that the European Union would consent to a lower tariff. The Presidents of Costa Rica, Panama, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia and Ecuador, and the Vice-President of Honduras, Vicente Williams, signed the Quito Declaration at the end of the conference on Jan. 26. In the declaration, the leaders rejected the proposed E.U. tariff hike, saying the change would have disastrous effects on Latin American economies. The next day, European Commission trade spokesman Claude Veron-Reville said the commission would submit the new tariff scheme to the WTO, rather than negotiate directly with Latin American leaders. Costa Rican Trade Minister Manuel González on Friday implied the European Union is intimidated by Latin American producers’ firm stance. “Latin America has acted like a single country, a single family,” he said. “The European Union is worried about the union that (our countries) represent.” He also criticized European leaders for reacting before having received the treaty formally, and for failing to explain the reasons behind the proposed change. González maintains the tariffs are discriminatory, since banana-producing countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific would continue to send their bananas to Europe tariff-free under the proposed regime (TT, Nov. 26, 2004). Veron-Reville said E.U. leaders are not interested in direct negotiations. “These types of proceedings have their place in Geneva, as established in the agreements we have made with (the Latin American) countries,” he said. According to González, official notification to the WTO begins a 60-day “consulting period,” during which either party can request formal arbitration of the dispute. Mentor Villagómez, Ecuador’s ambassador to Brussels, has said Ecuador would immediately request arbitration if the commission goes ahead with the notification. Latin American leaders say the tariff hike would cause unemployment and increase poverty for the hundreds of thousands of workers whose jobs depend on the banana industry. In Costa Rica, according to González, bananas constitute 10% of total exports for a total of $500 million in revenue per year, and the industry generates 100,000 direct and indirect jobs.
The Public Services Regulatory Authority (ARESEP) yesterday announced it has approved an increase in fuel prices by between 3-5%. The agency has approved a 3.82% hike in regular gasoline, from ¢340 ($0.74) to ¢353 ($0.77) per liter. The approved hike for “super” gasoline is 4.23%, from ¢355 ($0.77) to ¢370 ($0.80) per liter. Diesel will increase from ¢254 ($0.55) to ¢264 ($0.57) per liter and kerosene from ¢267 ($0.58) to ¢279 ($0.61) per liter. The price of propane gas bought in cylinders will also increase 3.75%. ARESEP attributed the rate hike to an increase in the international cost of petroleum, the devaluation of the colón and the government’s update of the fuel tax.
The Costa Rican Chamber of Commerce implored President Abel Pacheco to “conclusively and formally” send the U.S.-Central American Free-Trade Agreement (CAFTA) to the Legislative Assembly for discussion and an eventual vote. Chamber president Evita Arguedas made the petition, together with representatives of export businesses and economic advisors who studied the possible consequences of not approving the agreement. In a press conference, Arguedas said that in Costa Rica the export sector generates 331,000 jobs that account for 20% of the jobs in the private sector, which makes it “imperative” that CAFTA be discussed. “We cannot allow our rights to think, act and succeed to be limited in a country like ours that has the conditions and the capacity to solidify our position in the world economy,” Arguedas said. With this agreement, Costa Rica is assured “the creation of new jobs and opportunities, an increase in training and investment, and economic growth that will benefit every citizen,” she added. Also, she explained, more than 380,000 jobs would be directly and indirectly in danger if the agreement is not approved, which, according to estimates from the chamber, will elevate the rate of unemployment to 21% from the 6.4% it is at now. The Costa Rican government has projected an attitude of “uncertainty” toward the agreement, which has caused grave harm to the country’s image and has started to chase off foreign investment, she claimed. Pacheco has stated often that he will not send the agreement to the assembly until lawmakers approve a tax reform plan that has been in debate for more than two years. CAFTA, which still must be approved by the United States Congress, was ratified by El Salvador Dec. 17, 2004. Nicaragua, Guatemala and Honduras have already submitted the bill before their respective congresses. --EFE
Daily News | Home | Top Story | Business News | Central American News |
|||||||