Previous perspectives

Climate Change and the Commonwealth: Building Global Resilience

Posted: Thursday, September 22, 2011

We know also that our prosperity depends on our access to food, water and energy. Climate change threatens all of these.

By Henry Bellingham

 

With less than 50 days to go before the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth, Australia, I was pleased to be asked to speak at the Royal Commonwealth Society in London this week about the threat of climate change, and what this means for the Commonwealth.

Climate change is one of the greatest common challenges facing the modern world. As the minister for Africa and the overseas territories at the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office, I have seen firsthand the people and places that are being put in danger by the world’s inability to tackle this grave threat.

I believe that world which is failing to respond to climate change is one in which the values embodied in the Commonwealth will not be met.

Since taking office 16 months ago, I have traveled to 23 countries within my portfolio, and there is not one country among them where ordinary people are not threatened by global warming.

Although the poorest people will be worst affected by climate change, the extreme weather and floods that it can bring will affect the developed world also.

We know that climate change threatens global security. In July, the U.N. Security Council issued a presidential statement recognizing the role of climate change as a “risk multiplier,” exacerbating threats in places like Sudan, where drought and desertification brought on by climate change played a role in the conflict in Darfur.

We know also that our prosperity depends on our access to food, water and energy. Climate change threatens all of these.

The Commonwealth is a network that represents the spectrum of countries affected by climate change, in every continent on the planet, and it is a group of countries that are anchored by a shared set of values and a commitment to promoting global peace and stability.

It is my firm belief that the Com-monwealth has both a role to play in tackling climate change at a global level, and a chance to seize the opportunities of low carbon growth in trade, investment and new industries.

From business-level waste and energy-management techniques, through to large-scale, energy-efficient infrastructure planning, creative entrepreneurs are leading change, and businesses as diverse as Fosters and Vodafone have adopted voluntary emissions targets.

Strong intra-Commonwealth business groupings look to promote action, with the U.K.-India business leaders group on climate change providing an example of how this can work. We can show that climate-compatible development is possible for a whole range of economies, from smart metering in the U.K. to solar projects in Nigeria. 

On the global stage, the Common-wealth network carries weight when it speaks together. The U.N. climate conference in Durban at the end of this year matters.

The global politics of climate change are currently at low ebb – political leaders are understandably distracted by the immediacy of economic crisis. But we are coming to the end of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol and need to build an ambitious, global, legally binding regime involving all major emitters. 

Only a legally binding approach will give businesses and investors confidence to move rapidly to low carbon to keep global temperature rise within 2 degrees.

The official theme for the Com-monwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) 2011, “Building National Resilience, Building Global Resilience,” aptly captures both the challenge of climate change and the strengths of the Commonwealth that make us equipped to meet that challenge. 

At CHOGM, we need to set a shared vision of what we need at Durban and beyond:  progress this year on issues that really matter to Commonwealth countries, such as delivering climate finance for developing countries, and progress towards a legally binding deal.

 

Henry Bellingham is the U.K.’s parliamentary under-secretary of state at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

| Share

Log in or create a user account to comment.

Comments

I think it is always interesting when ignorance speaks so loudly. When one says "The world's climatologists" than they must understand that is a generalization that simply is not factual. There is a huge chasm of disagreement on these issues and many highly reputable scientists throughout the world simply disagree with the money grabbers who are making money from their positions about climate change. When you examine the true facts and statements made by such people as the author of this original article, the facts do not fit...if the glove does not fit then it proves it is simply not true. The facts of temperature change do not support this writers statements. I do agree that we, as a responsible race, should take steps to reduce pollution, but not due to climate change, rather to protect our environment from being polluted from our own lives here to the extent it is currently. But let's get our facts straight and fight for causes that are real and honest rather than this fabricated B.S.
THE WORLDS CLIMATOLOGISTS AGREE MAN IS A CONTRIBUTOR TO GLOBAL WARMING. THOSE WHO WOULD ATTACK THEIR CONCLUSION DO SO ON BEHALF OF THE GREEDY OIL CORPORATIONS. WHAT IF THE BELIEVERS IN THE CYCLICAL CHANGES ARE WRONG AND WE KEEP SPEWING POLLUTANTS INTO OUR ATMOSPHERE AND WATERS. WHY TAKE THAT CHANCE. WE MUST NOT SIT BACK AND LET OUR WORLD REACH A POINT WHERE THIS NOT A LIVABLE PLANET.
Yet another alarmist article on climate change from the Tico Times but this one written by a member of the UK government, is to promote their absurd Climate Change Act which is going to be a complete and very costly joke on the British public.
It is not global warming that is causing starvation and bad living conditions in many countries of the commonwealth but many despot dictators and governments who lining their pockets with the various handouts which should helping their people, I am sure Mr. Bellingham is aware of who they are.
The climate change model still being used by those scientists who are being paid large sums in various grants from the UN and governments around the world to spread these alarmist theories and stay on the climate change gravy train. It is now an open secret that many of the places where they take temperature readings violate rules that say readings may not be close to an artificial heating source. Temperatures taken by satellites reveal the hottest year in recent times was 1998 and that for the last ten years they have levelled off.
There are more and more eminent scientists finding the courage to point out, one of which is the distinguished physicist Professor William Happer of Princeton University is that it is far from clear that there is a serious problem, let alone a catastrophic one of global warming at all.
One could write pages of evidence that refutes global warming but why bore readers.
As for the UN trying to say that the ATROCITIES committed in Darfur could be blamed on climate change is one of most cretinous statements made by that bunch of overpaid idiots IT WAS OUT AND OUT GENOCIDE pursued by another despot regime which bombed women and children and paid gangs of criminals to roam the country raping and killing.
Mr. Bellingham,.

While I do not desire to challenge your position or intellect because I am sure this will do neither, I still feel a necessity to speak out about this whole idea about global warming. Only a clear precise question lingers on my mind ... what do you intend to do about natural global warming that is cyclic in nature and precedes an ice age periodically? Or are we so arrogant that we actually think we can control natural cycles that have been going on for over a million years or so?

I still believe there is way to much politics involved in this whole thinking process and too many people with too much money at stake who are making these statements about global warming and how detrimental it actually is. Nature always has a way of balancing herself out when a species tips the scales in the wrong direction. What makes us think that our species is so important that we should not eventually perish from this earth and go the way of other species before us? And if we cause this to happen more rapidly, well then such is the way of evolution, isn't it?