Business & Real Estate

Who has to pay the new corporate tax?

Posted: Friday, January 27, 2012
NEWS YOU CAN USE: The 2012 deadline is April 30.

On April 1, Law No. 9024, “Tax on Corporations,” will enter into force. Although the law levies a new tax on Costa Rican corporations, it allows U.S. citizens (as well as any other individual) to resign their current positions in Costa Rican companies that could be affected by the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and other related provisions. 

Law No. 9024 establishes a tax on all commercial corporations, branches or representatives of foreign corporations and sole proprietorships that are registered or will be registered with the National Registry. 

The corporate tax year runs from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31 of each year, and the new tax must be paid within the first 30 calendar days after Jan. 1 of each year; however, for 2012, the deadline is April 30.

The tax rate varies depending on whether taxpayers are active entities or not. Accordingly, taxpayers that do not conduct commercial activities and are inactive will pay a sum equivalent to 25 percent of a monthly base salary, while all those that are active should pay an equivalent of 50 percent of a monthly base salary. 

For the 2012 fiscal period, the tax will be paid proportionally (over a nine-month period); therefore, the amounts payable will be 135,225 ($264) for active corporations and 67,613 ($132) for inactive corporations (the “inactive” status is under analysis by the Tax Administration and new regulations are expected).

On the other hand, corporations, branches, representatives or sole proprietorships that will be registered in the future must pay the tax at the time of filing the articles of incorporation at the National Registry.

Corporations, subsidiaries, representatives of foreign corporations, and sole proprietorships that dissolve before July 1 do not have to pay the tax. 

Also, legal representatives of corporations will be jointly liable for non-payment, but have one year to resign their positions at the National Registry.

How is Law No. 9024 related to FATCA and other provisions? Readers may recall that on March 18, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama signed FATCA into law, requiring foreign financial institutions (FFIs) and non-financial foreign entities (NFFE, or any non-U.S. entity that is not a financial institution) to report information to the Internal Revenue Service regarding ownership or participation by U.S. citizens of bank accounts and corporations. That regulation will apply regardless of whether U.S. persons hold assets in U.S. or non-U.S. securities, or via entities in which they have a direct or indirect holding.

FFIs or NFFEs that fail to disclose this information will be subject to a 30 percent withholding tax imposed on payments (including interest, dividends, rents, salaries, wages or other periodic gains and income, as well as gross proceeds) derived from sources within the U.S., to uncooperative institutions and customers. 

Other related regulations require the reporting of entities in which U.S. taxpayers are directors, representatives, or hold similar positions.

As mentioned above, U.S. taxpayers may take advantage of regulations contained in Law No. 9024 in order to resign their positions as representatives of Costa Rican companies. Moreover, in order to avoid tax contingencies derived from the obligations imposed by FATCA and related laws in the U.S., as well as Law No. 9024, it is strongly advisable for U.S. citizens to revise their participation and ownership in such entities and bank accounts.

–Alonso Arroyo & Sophia Murillo

 Alonso Arroyo is a partner at BLP Abogados and leads the firm’s tax practice division. Sophia Murillo is an associate of tax practice at BLP Abogados.

See more at www.blpabogados.com.

  • Currently 0 out of 5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)

Thank you for rating!

You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!

Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!

Log in or create a user account to rate this page.

| Share

To comment, write a letter to the editor to letters@ticotimes.net. Please make sure to include your full name and location. Letters must be 500 words or fewer. Submissions should be original.

Log in or create a user account to comment.

Comments

I'm currently residing in US (and have been for 2 years), but have 2 small real estate properties in CR that are in an SA. I cannot travel to CR for the next 6 months because I am in school. None of the articles I read give any info on how to pay the corporate tax, if it can be done on-line, or how to dissolve an empty totally dormant corp (that we at one time used only for a vehicle). Can this be done through some CR authority online?

Also, there is no clear info about FATCA. Does one need to report to IRS an "inactive" (by CR definition) corporation? We have had our corp to hold the property since 2006. Do I need to file IRS form TDF-90-22.1 (acknowledging ownership of foreign corp) only on my 2011 tax return or do I need to file amended for 2010? If Obama only signed into law on March 18, 2010 was there any grace period or will it be necessary to do an amended return for 2010 and/or for years prior?

This is very troubling, as we always filed our US tax returns while in CR. My US accountant advised, as of my 2008 return, not to bother. I filed a very simple 1040A in 2009 and 2010, with Turbo Tax, and continued "not to bother" based on prior advice.

It would be helpful, for both your CR domestic and US readers, to provide an article with more clarification. Many of us are in no position to rack up legal or accounting fees here, there or both. This would be a great service to your many loyal readers who are as confused as I am. Everyone I talk to is confused, misguided and somewhat misinformed.

Many, many of your readers would appreciate an article addressing the above. I respect you cannot give legal or tax advice, but at least some more specific points might be covered. Many of us rely on the quality of information we garner for the "Tico-Times." And....it would also help to know, if one absolutely must use a tax or legal professional, the range of fees that could be expected to dissolve an existing SA. Also, can one get their personal name off of an inactive SA, and if so how is that replaced? and what is a typical standard fee if there are alternatives to the structure many of us had follow years ago? Thank you for any light you can shed in a future and more comprehensive article.

Weekend

Restaurants

100 percent good 1

After striving to formulate delicious gluten-free recipes and a special flour to prepare dishes f...

Arts & Leisure

Strike Up the Symphony

The 2012 lineup includes free Summer Concerts around the Central Valley, the official season of 1...

Travel

Riding the Wave 2

Local Costa Rican surfers who once worked for North American surf-school owners are setting up sh...

Fishing Fishing Forum

Sailfish on water

A 40-mile area around Carrillo on the northern Pacific coast will be closed to commercial longlin...