Top medical experts say we should decriminalize all drugs and maybe go even further

March 24, 2016

A group of 22 medical experts convened by Johns Hopkins University and The Lancet have called this week for the decriminalization of all nonviolent drug use and possession. Citing a growing scientific consensus on the failures of the global war on drugs, the experts further encourage countries and U.S. states to “move gradually toward regulated drug markets and apply the scientific method to their assessment.”

Their report comes ahead of a special U.N. General Assembly Session on drugs to be held next month, where the world’s countries will re-evaluate the past half-century of drug policy and, in the hope of many experts, chart a more public health-centered approach going forward.

In a lengthy review of the state of global drug policy, the Hopkins-Lancet experts conclude that the prohibitionist anti-drug policies of the past 50 years “directly and indirectly contribute to lethal violence, disease, discrimination, forced displacement, injustice and the undermining of people’s right to health.” They cite, among other things:

  • A “striking increase” in homicide in Mexico since the government decided to militarize its response to the drug trade in 2006. The increase has been so great that experts have had to revise life expectancy downward in that country;
  • The “excessive use” of incarceration as a drug control measure, which the experts identify as the “biggest contribution” to higher rates of HIV and Hepatitis C infection among drug users;
  • Stark racial disparities in drug law enforcement, particularly in the United States;
  • And human rights violations arising from excessively punitive drug control measures, including an increase in the torture and abuse of drug prisoners in places like Mexico.

“The goal of prohibiting all use, possession, production and trafficking of illicit drugs is the basis of many of our national drug laws, but these policies are based on ideas about drug use and drug dependence that are not scientifically grounded,” said Commissioner Chris Beyrer of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in a statement.

For instance, the last time the U.N. held a special session on drugs, in 1998, it set itself the goal of a “drug-free world” by 2008. The Hopkins-Lancet commissioners also fault U.N. drug regulators for failing to distinguish between drug use and drug abuse. “The idea that all drug use is dangerous and evil has led to enforcement-heavy policies and has made it difficult to see potentially dangerous drugs in the same light as potentially dangerous foods, tobacco and alcohol, for which the goal of social policy is to reduce potential harms,” they write.

Also see: It’s time to end the war on drugs

US police search drug suspect | drug legalization
New London police officers search a suspect for heroin on March 14, 2016 in New London, Connecticut. John Moore/Getty Images/AFP

Drug legalization: ‘There is another way’

The commissioners cite research showing that “of an estimated 246 million people who used an illicit drug in the past year, 27 million (around 11%) experienced problem drug use, which was defined as drug dependence or drug-use disorders.”

“The idea that all drug use is necessarily ‘abuse’ means that immediate and complete abstinence has been seen as the only acceptable approach,” commissioner Adeeba Kamarulzaman, a professor at the University of Malaya, said in a statement. But, she added, “continued criminalization of drug use fuels HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis transmission within prisons and the community at large. There is another way. Programmes and policies aimed at reducing harm should be central to future drug policies.”

The commissioners point to successes in drug decriminalization experiments in places like Portugal, where drug use rates have fallen, overdose deaths are rare and new HIV infections among drug users have plummeted. They recommend that other countries adopt a similar approach.

And beyond decriminalization, the commissioners recommend experimenting with the full legalization and regulation of certain types of drug use, as several U.S. states have done with marijuana.

“Although regulated legal drug markets are not politically possible in the short term in some places, the harms of criminal markets and other consequences of prohibition catalogued in this Commission will probably lead more countries [and more U.S. states] to move gradually in that direction-a direction we endorse,” they write.

A must read: Legalize It All

Other countries, particularly in Latin America, are already looking toward U.S. marijuana legalization experiments as a blueprint for how they might move away from overly punitive drug laws. But one challenge toward adopting a less stringent drug policy has always been the massive U.N. drug control treaties, which are now decades-old and which experts say reflect outdated and even harmful ways of thinking about drug use.

Reformers are hoping that the upcoming General Assembly Special Session on drugs will mark a turning point in the drug war. But getting nearly 200 countries to agree on any change in direction will be a challenge. And early indications appear to be that negotiators are setting their sights low.

A draft document of the resolution to be discussed at the special session reaffirms the U.N.’s “commitment to the goals and objectives of the three international drug control conventions” — the same conventions criticized in the Hopkins-Lancet report. And it calls on countries to “actively promote a society free of drug abuse,” echoing the language of the failed drug control goals of the 1990s.

© 2016, The Washington Post

You may be interested

Off the eaten path: Cantina X
Dining and Nightlife
Dining and Nightlife

Off the eaten path: Cantina X

William Ayre - September 21, 2018

You’ll find one of the best chifrijos in the country at the base of a mountain near Salitral in Santa…

Costa Rica eyeing four candidates to lead La Sele
La Sele
La Sele

Costa Rica eyeing four candidates to lead La Sele

AFP and The Tico Times - September 20, 2018

Costa Rica is looking at four potential candidates to fill the position of head coach of the national team amid…

How to vote in the 2018 midterm elections from Costa Rica
1974 views2
1974 views2

How to vote in the 2018 midterm elections from Costa Rica

The Tico Times - September 20, 2018

The 2018 midterm elections in the United States are right around the corner. Hundreds of state and congressional seats are…

6 Responses

  1. Prohibition of certain drugs like marijuana has caused way more harm than good. Societies still ignore science and maintain that a very dangerous drug (alcohol) should be entirely OK while a very harmless one (marijuana) is demonized. Wake up Costa Rica and join the revolution of reason and compassion instead of costly and harshly enforced prohibition – especially with marijuana.

  2. Of all the news articles published throughout the world today, the Tico Times pulled one about decriminalizing drugs from the Washington Post. Thats two articles on this topic in the past several weeks. And both articles contain numerous links that all favor or support legalization. Do the editors at Tico Times have an agenda? Here’s a link with an opposing view:

  3. Let’s look are the two articles.

    In the post by The TT, I note that the WaPo author is reporting on the findings of a group of 22 medical experts convened by Johns Hopkins University and The Lancet. You know, MD’s, and actual researchers, those people you just might know what they are talking about.

    The US News article is not even a report. It’s an whole-cloth opinion blog by a lawyer who serves a obvious agenda of maintaining her “industry”.

    To compare the two articles is false equivalency.

    The “industry” of enforcement, for-profit incarceration, property seizures, monetary forfeitures and police militarization is now the biggest impediment to achieving a rational policy on drug use.

    That and the fact that the “war” has failed miserably.

  4. Duh, everybody whose head isn’t in the sand already knows this.

    The real question is why policymakers don’t follow the obviously sensible path–and I don’t mean this as a rhetorical question. We now know that the war on drugs was launched by the Nixon administration in order to repress its opponents, and I’m pretty sure it persists largely to provide the US with an excuse for maintaining a military presence in Latin America. Since the US knows the drug war is a failure, there must after all be other explanations for its continuing. I think we need to find those explanations and address them, since continuing to argue over drugs themselves is to persist in a debate that is largely settled.

    Meanwhile, the real challenge is to quiet the potheads (not a few of whom appear to be working for the Tico Times). Legalizing pot because a white middle class likes to smoke it will do next to nothing to alleviate the suffering and deaths of the minorities in the US and people in Latin America caught up in the rest of the drug trade.

    Legalizing pot without addressing the rest of the drugs is about like legalizing wine while outlawing guaro. It’s nice for the affluent wine drinkers, just doesn’t do anything for anyone else. Worse, it misdirects where public policy needs to go by substituting the narrow tastes of a privileged minority for an engagement with the overall issue.

    Mind, I doubt that all drugs should be decrimininalized. A few are positively dangerous. However, policy needs to change regarding a lot more drugs than pot, and people everywhere will be better served by a more rational and scientific legal classification of drugs.

    But believe you me, if you only allow pot, you’re not making good public policy, just serving your own tastes. Do it all, or don’t do it at all.

  5. Undeniably believe that which you said. Your
    favorite reason seemed to be on the nnet the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while peoplle consider worries that they just don’t know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing
    without having side effect , people could take a signal.
    Will likely be back tto get more. Thanks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.