San José, Costa Rica, since 1956
Border dispute

Costa Rica, Nicaragua enter final hearings at The Hague in border dispute

Final hearings start Tuesday at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the long-running border dispute between Costa Rica and Nicaragua.

During the final stage of the legal process at The Hague, Netherlands, which started in 2010, legal teams from each country will present their closing arguments. The hearings are scheduled to last until May 1.

ICJ justices in 2013 decided to join claims of both countries into a single case, in order to save time and ensure that final rulings on both cases can be reached in the same tone.

A date for the ICJ’s ruling has yet to be announced. But experts from both countries have said they believe it will come later this year.

150414InfoCRNIC1

What are they disputing?

Costa Rica v. Nicaragua

In 2010 Costa Rica filed the first complaint against Nicaragua for alleged invasion by military personnel of a 3-square-kilometer territory both countries claim as their own.

Costa Rica calls the site Isla Portillos and Nicaragua calls it Harbour Head. The small area is protected by the RAMSAR Convention on Wetlands of International Importance.

In 2013 Costa Rica expanded its complaint and accused Nicaragua of carrying out dredging works that affected its territory, and of constructing artificial canals in the disputed area with the purpose of connecting the San Juan River with the Caribbean Sea. The ICJ had ordered both countries to keep out of the disputed area.

Nicaragua v. Costa Rica

In 2011 Nicaragua responded by filing a complaint against Costa Rica for alleged environmental damage to the San Juan River, a natural border between the two countries. The damage, Nicaragua claimed, resulted from the construction of a 160-kilometer road, Route 1856, that runs parallel to the river.

Costa Rica built the road as a response to complaints from residents of border communities who are forbidden by Nicaraguan military from using the San Juan River for transportation.

What happens at the final hearings?

The first week of hearings will address the Costa Rica v. Nicaragua case. Costa Rica’s legal team will have two days to present its closing arguments and Nicaragua’s team will have two days to refute them.

Nicaraguan lawyers will open the second week with oral arguments against Costa Rica’s alleged environmental damage for two days, and then Costa Rica will have two to respond.

The third and last week is open for rejoinders. April 28 and 29 will be dedicated to the Portillos Island case, while April 30 and May 1 are scheduled for the border road case.

Costa Rica’s closing arguments will include testimony by two experts from the United Kingdom: Colin Thorne, Professor of Physical Geography at the University of Nottingham and professor Ian Cowx, from University of Hull‘s International Fisheries Institute.

They both will present the results of studies carried out at Costa Rica’s request. The studies are part of the 5,846 pages of evidence the legal team filed at earlier stages of the trial.

Nicaragua has not yet disclosed if it will file new evidence.

Who are the legal teams?

Costa Rica’s group of legal advisers during the first week will be headed by Foreign Minister Manuel González Sanz. Then the country’s representatives before The Hague court, Edgar Ugalde and Sergio Ugalde, will lead the team. The legal group also includes Foreign Ministry lawyers Arnoldo Brenes, Shara Duncan and Richard Otárola, and three lawyers from Switzerland, England and the U.S.: Marcelo Kohen, Samuel Wordsworth and Kate Parlett.

Nicaragua’s legal team will be led by Ambassador to the Netherlands Carlos Argüello Gómez, plus U.S. attorneys Paul Reichler and Lawrence Martin and Professor Alain Pellet of the University of Paris.

What has the court already ruled? 

Following Costa Rica’s first claim, the ICJ imposed injunctions in March 2011 ordering both countries to completely clear out of the disputed area pending a final ruling.

The measure was reaffirmed in November 2013, following Costa Rica’s second complaint against Nicaragua for violating the court’s orders by dredging two canals inside the disputed territory. Costa Rica claimed the canals caused environmental damage, a claim later confirmed by RAMSAR experts as “irreparable damage.”

Nicaragua complied with the decision, stopped dredging works and started repair work on the canals.

In April 2013 the Court rejected four separate complaints from Nicaragua seeking to halt construction of the border road in Costa Rica. At the time, the ICJ stated that “Nicaragua failed to demonstrate the project’s damage to the San Juan River, or alleged dangers to flora and fauna inside Nicaraguan territory.”

Justices also rejected Nicaragua’s petition to strip Costa Rica of its rights to the jointly-held bay of San Juan del Norte. They also rejected Nicaragua’s petition for navigation rights on the Colorado River, located entirely within Costa Rican territory.

Nicaragua claims that because the majority of San Juan River waters flow into the Colorado River, that country should have navigation rights on the river, in exchange for Costa Rican navigation rights on the San Juan.

As a result of these rulings, the ICJ announced it would consolidate both countries’ complaints into a single case to expedite the process.

What’s happened recently on the ground? 

Last year Nicaragua’s dredging project leader and former guerrilla Edén Pastora, known as “Comandante Cero,” said Nicaragua planned to bring 15 more dredges to the San Juan “in order to continue cleaning the river.”

Earlier this month, Costa Rica blocked one of the artificial canals that Nicaragua opened in 2013.

What is Costa Rica expecting from the ICJ rulings?

Costa Rican President Luis Guillermo Solís wants the international court’s ok in order to resume construction of Route 1856. Last year Solís vowed to finish the scandal-ridden road project, telling La Nación that the previous administration had “left him a mess.”

Border communities say they need the road because they’re no longer allowed to freely use the San Juan River as they had traditionally done before the conflict. In recent months Costa Rican officials have received several reports of Nicaraguan military repeatedly forbidding Costa Ricans to travel on the river.

In a 2009 ICJ ruling, the court prohibited armed Costa Rican police officers from using the river for transit. But members of the Nicaragua army have detained residents, tourists, tourism employees and even scientific groups and international observers from RAMSAR who traveled to the area to assess the alleged damage in Costa Rican territory.

What about the countries’ other cases before The Hague? 

The final decision in the Costa Rica-Nicaragua case could pave the way for rulings on other territorial disputes involving Nicaragua. Besides Costa Rica, the country has cases pending before the ICJ against Honduras, El Salvador, Panama and Colombia.

In all those cases Nicaragua seeks rights over territories it considers its own.

In February 2014, Costa Rica filed a new lawsuit before the ICJ to define maritime borders with Nicaragua in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean, where Nicaragua has been looking to expand its territory. The case will be tried in a new separate process at The Hague.

Nicaragua does have one ICJ victory under its belt: in 1986 the court ruled in favor of Nicaragua on its claim of illegal U.S. military and paramilitary occupation of Nicaraguan territory.

The Tico Times reporter Zach Dyer contributed to this story.

Contact L. Arias at larias@ticotimes.net

Log in to comment

acwatson

Your disrespect has been noted. Your human rights are a reflection of your religion.

0 0
acwatson

Hey Costa Rica, I have a Hague dispute for you, My rights with my daughter were taken away thanks to your court system that selectivity chooses what laws to use that apparently don’t include the convention. I personally handed the laws printed from a CR website and handed them to the Inspection Judicial regarding the complaint against the judge that decided they don’t apply to parents not in the country. When the investigation was completed I was told basically they don’t use those laws. So if your not going to respect the laws you have signed on to and agreed to how can you expect anyone to take you seriously? There is no mechanism in place for me after what I went through financially to take this to the grand court and seek retribution. As far as Im concerned the CR government has no respect for anyone but themselves in the circle of control. My Hague dispute got completed and filed with PANI and I was told it was sent to the appropriate authorities in the US. It never got sent, the adult daycare center that runs PANI is a sad joke. To anyone planing on using these systems or organizations thinking there will be justice, don’t hold your breath, they will waste your time and energy that can be used much more wisely with your goals.

0 0