San José, Costa Rica, since 1956
Moín Port project

UPDATE: Atlantic ports paralyzed after dockworkers go on 'indefinite' strike

Update Wednesday, Oct. 22, 12:10 p.m.:

Traffic at the Atlantic Port Authority’s (JAPDEVA) docks ground to a halt as the public agency’s union, SINTRAJAP, made good on its threat to strike over the terms of a $1 billion dollar port concession to Dutch company APM Terminals.

SINTRAJAP leader Ronaldo Blear announced that the docks in Limón and Moín would be closed starting at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, according to Costa Rica’s Radio ADN.

The union said the strike was a “fight for dignity, to stop a monopoly and avoid serious harm to the people of Limón,” according to a statement.

“We want modern ports without monopolies and [with] fair competition,” it continued.

Israel Oconitrillo, a spokesman for JAPDEVA, confirmed to the daily La Nación that the ports were closed.

Pablo Díaz, general manager of JAPDEVA, told La Nación that when the strike began there was a ship docked in Moín that needed another hour to unload its cargo. The manager said that handling of cargo at two more container ships at the Limón port was also interrupted by the strike Wednesday morning.

President Luis Guillermo Solís said Tuesday that a strike by the union was unjustified and he urged union workers to go back to work.

“We support the legality of the contracts signed by the Costa Rican state, this is a legal discussion. The law must be followed,” Solís tweeted during a visit to the Reventazón hydroelectric project near the Caribbean slope town of Siquirres.

The president said during a press conference Tuesday that National Police would be at the docks to maintain order if protests became violent.

Original post continues here:

Costa Rica’s proposed $1 billion Moín port expansion is facing another potential setback as the Atlantic Port Authority’s (JAPDEVA) union (SINTRAJAP) threatens a strike in Limón in coming days. SINTRAJAP leaders and some lawmakers believe a provision of the concession grants AMP Terminals a monopoly on handling containers, and therefore threatens stevedores’ jobs.

SINTRAJAP leaders announced the strike on Monday, but gave no firm date for when it would take place in Limón.

President Luis Guillermo Solís denounced the threat during a press conference on Tuesday, saying a strike was unjustified and Costa Rica would honor the terms of the contract signed in 2011.

“A strike in Limón is not justified; it only hurts the interests of many Limón residents,” Solís said. “We’re not going to allow a small group of people who have made statements that appear contrary to the Costa Rican spirit of conciliation and peaceful understanding to jeopardize an entire population who needs real job opportunities, not threats,” he added at Casa Presidencial.

The union’s threat to strike is not in vain. A SINTRAJAP strike in 2013 forced a cruise ship bearing 2,000 tourists to pass by Limón, costing the province an estimated $8,000 in lost tax revenue.

“The decision of this government continues to be to respect the legality of the contract, as it has been upheld by judges,” Solís added. The 33-year contract gives APM Terminals permission to construct and operate a new port called the Moín Container Terminal on Costa Rica’s northern Caribbean coast.

The Union of Private-Sector Chambers and Associations, an organization that represents over 40 national businesses, condemned the threat of a strike in a statement on Tuesday.

Costa Rica has some of the worst port infrastructure in Latin America, according to data from the World Bank. Officials and business leaders have framed the project as essential to revitalizing the Limón port and creating desperately needed jobs in the poorest province in Costa Rica.

A statement from the Public Works and Transport Ministry late Tuesday afternoon said the new terminal would quadruple the amount of traffic the port could handle.

Conflict over the port expansion has simmered for years. Recently, debate over a clause that would give a monopoly to APM for the loading and unloading of containers sparked the latest confrontation between the government and SINTRAJAP. Jorge Mora, technical secretary for the National Concessions Council, said in a statement that the contract gives APM the right to handle containers only, not small and mixed cargo, which currently makes up 40 percent of JAPDEVA’s workload.

Unions have fought the concession since it was first signed. In 2012, a San José administrative court upheld the contract, signed by President Laura Chinchilla (2010-2014) in 2011.

Objections from unions aside, the Moín project is also awaiting environmental approval from the National Technical Secretariat of the Environmental Ministry.

Contact Zach Dyer at

Log in to comment

Frank Castle

If Costa Rica doesn’t get with the program and build this port, Nicaragua will get all of its business within a few years with the port they will build on the Caribbean side of the Gran Canal. Shippers will ignore Costa Rica then. This union is going to destroy the lives of its members if it doesn’t compromise because all of their jobs will disappear.

0 0
Mark Kahle

There is a huge need for a modern port. Costa Rica must be able to compete. Just the price disparity between the proposed terminal and the Japdeva terminal will give the new port the monopoly. The ability to offload and load in less time and the desire of people to receive their goods as shipped, minus the constant pilfering, will have people dictating their shipments are handled by the new port only.

If there is a monopoly it was handed by JAPDEVA to any competitor on a silver platter due to their very own way of doing business.

0 0
Colin Brownlee

Like the previous article in TT, you fail to mention the over-whelming support of the terminal from Limon residents and the rest of Costa Rica. In fact, going back even further… an article that has since mysteriously disappeared from TT website claiming that majority of residents were not in favour of port contradicted all surveys published by national media.

“The union does not like this… There is going to be environmental damage… ” I think that the majority of your readers and residents have understood this consequence for a long time.

0 0