San José, Costa Rica, since 1956

Transport Ministry says Cañas-Liberia highway expansion will help local businesses, but residents are wary

CAÑAS, Guanacaste – The widening to four lanes of the Inter-American Highway North, from Cañas to Liberia, is moving forward at full pace.

A recent visit by The Tico Times to the construction site confirmed that the project already has changed the lives of hundreds of local residents who use the highway daily. But not all the changes are good, some locals say.

Officials from the Public Works and Transport Ministry, or MOPT, say that communities along the Inter-American Highway will benefit from the highway’s expansion because travel times will be faster and the road will be safer for drivers and pedestrians. Plus, it will create new jobs, they say.

The project started in May 2012, and although MOPT and the private construction consortium FCC have not stated when it will be finished, the contract sets a final date of May 31, 2015.

According to MOPT project managers Carlos Villalta, Enrique Obed and Kenneth Solano,contracts for 18 new or renovated bridges have different completion dates leading up to the May 2015 deadline. Three intersections also will be modified – in Cañas, Bagaces and Liberia – by Spanish construction firm Puentes y Calzadas SLU. The deadline for the new intersections is November 2015.

MOPT officials said in an email reply to The Tico Times that the project is important for Costa Rica and specifically for the northwestern region because it forms part of the Pacific Corridor of the International Mesoamerican Highways Network. They said it would help foster “development and productive links to Guanacaste.”

A glimpse of things to come.

Fabiola Pomareda/The Tico Times

More tourism

The officials also said the highway’s expansion would “strengthen links to other tourism regions in the country, and create sources of employment during and after construction.”

But there is much speculation as to the specific benefits for adjacent communities, and not much has been put down on paper.

Villalta, Obed and Solano highlighted only the project’s goal of providing better roadway conditions and a safer and faster route.

They said the project would “promote new job sources by creating a better business environment.”

It has created temporary jobs: Currently 350 new hires are working on the roadway, while 230 workers are building bridges and 200 others are slated to renovate the three intersections.

According to MOPT, once finished, the expanded highway will reduce travel times by at least an hour.

Transport officials say the project will help link the area to other tourism regions in the country.

Fabiola Pomareda/The Tico Times

Locals aren’t entirely convinced

Esmeralda Arévalo, a master’s student in wildlife conservation at the National University, chose the project for her dissertation. During her research, she spoke directly with residents from nearby communities who will be affected by the project, interviewing 81 people who live along the route, specifically between El Salto River and Cañas River. The interviews took place from June to December 2013.

Arévalo spoke with residents of San Cristóbal, Cañas, El Pretal, Corobicí, Hacienda La Pacífica, Montenegro, La Guaria, Villa Vieja, Bagaces, Pijije and El Salto, communities with diverse businesses and people. Arévalo told The Tico Times that she asked locals if they thought the project would have a positive or negative influence on their lives, and if they favored or opposed it.

Many said they viewed the project as positive and “necessary” for the development of their communities. Others said construction already has hurt their small businesses, which include sodas (small restaurants), auto service centers, fruit shops and pulperías (corner stores).

Of those interviewed, 33 saw the project as a positive development, while 42 said it was a negative one. Six people said they did not have enough information to decide.

Positive responses included statements such as: “It’s a good thing”; “it incorporates safety measures” (such as better signage, more speed control, pedestrian bridges and sidewalks); it is “fundamental for the community’s development”; “it improves transit”; “it was desperately needed”; “it will facilitate a greater number of vehicles”; and it’s “bonita” (pretty).

Negative opinions included: It’s “a bad thing because now [pedestrians] won’t be able to cross” (the project does include pedestrian bridges and sidewalks); “it’s incredibly ugly”; “it’s problematic” and “dangerous”; or “very dangerous”; it’s “an inconvenience” and a “waste of money”; and it’s a “massive headache.”

Others said the project has generated “uncertainty.”

Asked if the highway expansion would bring benefits to the communities, 26 people said yes, while 49 said no. Six did not respond.

Among the benefits mentioned were more businesses, a better business environment, new jobs in the region and more tourism. Some mentioned the new pedestrian bridges, ease of transit and increased property values.

Negative comments included “it won’t bring anything positive,” there are “no benefits,” it’s “very noisy,” and it is “unnecessary.” Some said it would hurt businesses, not help. Others said it is “dangerous for children,” and has brought “additional costs and problems.”

“In Cañas, for example, one gentleman who changes tires said that cars no longer can access his business. Others said that the new elevated highway means drivers won’t be able to see their businesses, there won’t be enough parking and income is going to decrease,” Arévalo said. “In San Cristóbal, school administrators said the highway is dangerous for children.”

Some claimed that the removal of trees in the area was unnecessary, that the project has caused significant environmental damage and that many animals have been killed on the highway due to loss or disruption of habitat.

They also complained about a lack of information regarding the project and an abundance of dust.

Some businesses stand to gain with a new highway, officials say, while others, like this soda, will have to go back to the drawing board.

Fabiola Pomareda/The Tico Times

Mayor: Better roads are a good thing

Bagaces Mayor Jorge Rojas told The Tico Times that Bagaces “has benefited significantly from the expansion.” He said it has generated jobs and businesses have benefited. For example, many temporary workers are housed in local cabinas, which they rent.

“We know that this is an important project, not only for Costa Rica’s future, but also for an entire network of countries,” Rojas said. “It benefits us because we can move more quickly and have better routes.”

Rojas said the project also has helped generate interest in investment. “We’ve seen people come here with an interest in setting up shop along the highway, because it’s going to cut travel time from the airport at [the provincial capital of] Liberia and from Caldera Port,” on the central Pacific coast.

The Pacific Corridor – which includes the Inter-American Highway North – links Puebla, Mexico, to Panama City.

Fabiola Pomareda/The Tico Times

Important regional links

“This corridor extends from Puebla, in Mexico, to Panama, and it favors the exchange of people and goods. It reduces travel time, which will help reduce operating costs and the final cost for consumers who buy the products,” the three MOPT officials said in a joint email.

The International Network of Mesoamerican Highways, or RICAM, was established on June 28, 2002 in Mérida, Mexico. Several countries, including Costa Rica signed a memorandum of understanding that sought to modernize more than 13,000 kilometers of highways in the region.

RICAM’s objective, according to its website, is to “open new possibilities for Mesoamerican integration and place exportable production within market reach via land routes that connect populations, productive zones and principal points of distribution.”

The Pacific Corridor – which includes the Inter-American Highway North – is a regional corridor of integration that spans 3,244 kilometers of highways that cross six international borders and seven countries along the Pacific coast. Some 95 percent of traded goods in Mexico and Central America pass within this corridor.

According to MOPT officials, “much of the transport cargo that currently uses other corridors will eventually use this improved corridor with the expectation of better travel times.”

Villalta, Obed and Solano added that “by promoting faster access to the La Cruz region, expansion will allow regional links to La Cruz, Mirmania, Santa Cecilia, Muelle, National Route 4 and the new Atlantic corridor Bajos de Chilamate-Vuelta de Kopper.”

Log in to comment


As a resident of Limon its sad reading the comment from Kohl where they are not only fixing the road but also putting in wide sidewalks even in areas where nobody lives and comparing it to the heavily transited Rt 32 between San Jose – Limon, where the countries largest port is located. The road is bumper to bumper trucks, cars, bikes and pedestrians all sharing two lanes without sidewalks or pedestrian bridges. The difference is that while other parts of the country get major road improvement projects this one is still the redheaded stepchild that is being left behind once again. Not much of a change provided despite assurances by the new president to support the poor coastal province that is plagued by high unemployment and little investment. PAC congressmen like Otton Solis gloating at the prospect that no agreement might be reached regarding the long awaited construction is just wrong and irresponsable. Yes, businesses are struggling or have closed their doors here too but not for the same reasons. And it might get worse

1 0
David Boddiger

Thanks for your comment.

0 0

We use this road regularly and at this present time, if driving after dark, you are risking your life.
The thousands of trees that were eliminated was unnecessary, and the very wide and expensive sidewalks that are now being poured, there is no one living in these areas. At least place them where needed, where families live. Problems abound when it rains heavily, as the water runs down onto private property. I understand that in some areas culverts have been installed but not everywhere they are needed, at least at the present time.
If someone was to ask NOW, if businesses have been affected the answer would be YES, as is living with this new construction. Many of the ‘businesses cannot be accessed unless you drive quite a distance to get turned around. Look how many are ‘up for sale’….or have just closed their doors.

1 0
David Boddiger

Thanks for your comment and for contributing to this discussion.

0 0